This interim staff report shares findings from the House Judiciary Committee’s investigation of whether the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) sought to bias judges who may hear climate-related cases through judicial educational training programs. Among other concerns, the report alleges that ELI through its Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) designed educational trainings “designed to predispose judges to rule in favor of radical environmentalists.” It also raises concern about potential conflicts of interest amongst authors and presenters at CJP seminars, who may have ongoing or prior communications with litigants in climate cases.
Tags: 119th (2025-2026) | environmental | judicial independence
